|
Legal
Reports Produced by JJAC
Jewish
Refugees from Arab Countries: Case for Rights and
Redress
JJAC
convened an international Committee of Legal Experts,
co-chaired by Prof. Irwin Cotler and David Matas,
that documents strong legal arguments for the legitimate
rights, under international law, of Jews displaced
from Arab countries.
|
|
UN & Middle East Refugees: Differing
Treatment of Palestinians & Jews
Extensive
research into voting patterns and UN meeting transcripts
reveal that the UN did accord differential treatment
to Palestinian refugees, by every measure, including,
among others: UN resolutions; UN Agency involvement;
and financial support.
|
|
Collusion
by Arab League in Displacement of Jews from Arab Countries
Over
time, Arab League member states colluded in, and coordinated,
a shared pattern of conduct that appeared intended
to coerce Jews to leave, or to use them as weapons
in their struggle against first Zionism and then the
State of Israel.
|
|
UN
Resolution 242: "Just Settlement of the Refugee
Problem"
Still
considered the primary vehicle for resolving the Arab-Israel
conflict, Resolution 242, stipulates that a
comprehensive peace settlement should necessarily
include a just settlement of the refugee problem.
No distinction is made between Arab refugees and Jewish
refugees.
|
|
Legal
Bases for the Rights of Jewish Refugees
Excerpts from
2007 report entitled: "Jewish Refugees from Arab Countries:
The Case for Rights and Redress" (http://www.justiceforjews.com/jjac.pdf)
which documents the legal arguments for the legitimate rights of
Jews displaced from Arab countries.
A) United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
On two occasions,
in 1957 and again in 1967, the United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees (UNHCR) determined that Jews fleeing from Arab
countries were refugees who fell within the mandate of the UNHCR.
"Another
emergency problem is now arising: that of refugees from Egypt.
There is no doubt in my mind that those refugees from Egypt who
are not able, or not willing to avail themselves of the protection
of the Government of their nationality fall under the mandate
of my office."
--Mr.
Auguste Lindt, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Report of
the UNREF Executive Committee, Fourth Session - Geneva 29 January
to 4 February, 1957.
"I
refer to our recent discussion concerning Jews from Middle Eastern
and North African countries in consequence of recent events.
I am now able to inform you that such persons may be considered
prima facie within the mandate of this Office."
--Dr. E. Jahn, Office of the UN High Commissioner,
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Document No.
7/2/3/Libya, July 6, 1967.
B) UN Resolution(s)
On November
22nd, 1967, the Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution
242, laying down the principles for a peaceful settlement in the
Middle East. Still considered the primary vehicle for resolving
the Arab-Israel conflict, Resolution 242 stipulates that a comprehensive
peace settlement should necessarily include "a just settlement
of the refugee problem." No distinction is made between
Arab refugees and Jewish refugees. (See further, Appendix A)
The international
community's intention to have Resolution 242 include the rights
of Jewish refugees is evidenced by the UN debate, as discussed by
the Security Council at its 1382nd meeting of November 22, 1967.
The international community adopted a resolution with generic language
that does not restrict the "just settlement of the refugee
problem" merely to Palestinian refugees. This was the
intent of the Resolution's drafters and sponsors. (See attached,
page 4: UN Resolution 242": "Just Settlement of the
Refugee Problem")
Moreover, Justice
Arthur Goldberg, the United States' Chief Delegate to the UN, who
was instrumental in drafting the unanimously adopted U.N. Resolution
242, has pointed out that:
"A
notable omission in 242 is any reference to Palestinians, a Palestinian
state on the West Bank or the PLO. The resolution addresses the
objective of 'achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem.'
This language presumably refers both to Arab and Jewish refugees,
for about an equal number of each abandoned their homes as a result
of the several wars
." (1)
C) Multilateral
Initiatives
- The Madrid
Conference, which was first convened in October 1991, launched
historic, direct negotiations between Israel and many of her Arab
neighbors.
In his opening
remarks at a conference convened to launch the multilateral process
held in Moscow in January 1992, then-U.S. secretary of state James
Baker made no distinction between Palestinian refugees and Jewish
refugees in articulating the mandate of the Refugee Working Group
as follows: "The refugee group will consider practical ways
of improving the lot of people throughout the region who have been
displaced from their homes." (2)
- The Road
Map to Middle East peace currently being advanced by the Quartet
(the U.N., EU, U.S., and Russia also refers in Phase III to an
"agreed, just, fair and realistic solution to the refugee
issue", language applicable both to Palestinian
and Jewish refugees.
D) Bilateral
Arab-Israeli Agreements
Israeli agreements with her Arab neighbors allow for a case to be
made that Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinians have affirmed that
a comprehensive solution to the Middle East conflict will require
a "just settlement" of the "refugee problem"
that will include recognition of the rights and claims of all Middle
East refugees:
- Israel
- Egypt Agreements
The Camp David
Framework for Peace in the Middle East of 1978 (the "Camp David
Accords") includes, in paragraph A(1)(f), a commitment by Egypt
and Israel to "work with each other and with other interested
parties to establish agreed procedures for a prompt, just and permanent
resolution of the implementation of the refugee problem."
Article 8 of
the Israel - Egypt Peace Treaty of 1979 provides that the
"Parties agree to establish a claims commission for the
mutual settlement of all financial claims." Those
claims include those of former Jewish refugees displaced from Egypt.
- Israel
- Jordan Peace Treaty, 1994
Article 8 of
the Israel - Jordan Peace Treaty, entitled "Refugees and Displaced
Persons" recognizes, in paragraph 1, "the massive human
problems caused to both Parties by the conflict in the Middle East".
Reference to massive human problems in a broad manner suggests that
the plight of all refugees of "the conflict in the Middle East"
includes Jewish refugees from Arab countries.
- Israeli-Palestinian
Agreements, 1993-
Almost every
reference to the refugee issue in Israeli-Palestinian agreements,
talks about "refugees", without qualifying which refugee
community is at issue, including the Declaration of Principles
of 13 September 1993 {Article V (3)}, and the Interim Agreement
of September 1995 {Articles XXXI (5)}, both of which refer to
"refugees" as a subject for permanent status negotiations,
without qualifications.
E) Recognition by Political Leaders
" Former
U.S. President Bill Clinton made the following assertion
after the rights of Jews displaced from Arab countries were discussed
at 'Camp David II' in July, 2000 (From White House Transcript of
Israeli television interview):
"There
will have to be some sort of international fund set up for the
refugees. There is, I think, some interest, interestingly enough,
on both sides, in also having a fund which compensates the Israelis
who were made refugees by the war, which occurred after the birth
of the State of Israel. Israel is full of people, Jewish people,
who lived in predominantly Arab countries who came to Israel because
they were made refugees in their own land".
Canadian
Prime Minister Paul Martin stated, in a June 3rd, 2005 interview
with the Canadian Jewish News which he later reaffirmed in a July
14, 2005 letter:
"A
refugee is a refugee and that the situation of Jewish refugees
from Arab lands must be recognized. All refugees deserve our consideration
as they have lost both physical property and historical connections.
I did not imply that the claims of Jewish refugees are less legitimate
or merit less attention than those of Palestinian refugees."
Appendix A: UN Resolution 242: "Just Settlement
of the Refugee Problem"
At the United
Nations, on November 22nd, 1967, the Security Council unanimously
adopted, Resolution 242, laying down the principles for a peaceful
settlement in the Middle East.
Still considered
the primary vehicle for resolving the Arab-Israel conflict, Resolution
242, stipulates that a comprehensive peace settlement should necessarily
include "a just settlement of the refugee problem". No
distinction is made between Arab refugees and Jewish refugees. This
was the intent of the Resolution's drafters and sponsors.
On Thursday,
November 16, 1967 the United Kingdom submitted their draft of Resolution
242 [S/8247] to the UN Security Council. The UK version of 242 was
not exclusive, and called for a just settlement of "the refugee
problem." Just four days after the United Kingdom submission,
the Soviet Union's U.N. delegation submitted their own draft Resolution
242 to the Security Council [S/8253] restricting the just settlement
only to "Palestinian refugees" [Para. 3 (c)].
On Wednesday,
November 22, 1967, the Security Council gathered for its 1382nd
meeting in New York at which time, the United Kingdom's draft of
Resolution 242 was voted on and unanimously approved.(3) Immediately
after the UK's version of 242 was adopted, the Soviet delegation
advised the Security Council, that "it will not insist, at
the present stage of our consideration of the situation in the Near
East, on a vote on the draft Resolution submitted by the Soviet
Union" which would have limited 242 to Palestinian refugees
only.(4) Even so, Ambassador Kuznetsov of the Soviet Union later
stated: "The Soviet Government would have preferred the Security
Council to adopt the Soviet draft Resolution
" (5)
Thus the attempt
by the Soviets to restrict the "just settlement of the refugee
problem" merely to "Palestinian refugees" was not
successful. The international community adoption of the UK's inclusive
version signaled a desire for 242 to seek a just solution for all
- including Jewish refugees.
Moreover, Justice
Arthur J. Goldberg, the US Ambassador to the United Nations who
was seminally involved in drafting (6) the unanimously adopted Resolution,
told The Chicago Tribune that the Soviet version of Resolution 242
was "not even-handed."(7)
He went further,
in pointing out that:
"A
notable omission in 242 is any reference to Palestinians, a Palestinian
state on the West Bank or the PLO. The resolution addresses the
objective of 'achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem.'
This language presumably refers both to Arab and Jewish refugees,
for about an equal number of each abandoned their homes as a result
of the several wars
." (8)
Sources
Cited
(1)
Goldberg, Arthur J., "Resolution 242: After 20 Years",
published in Security Interests, National Committee on American
Foreign Policy, April 2002.
(2)
Remarks by Secretary of State James A. Baker, III before the Organizational
Meeting for Multilateral Negotiations on the Middle East, House
of Unions, Moscow, January 28, 1992.
(3)
Security Council Official Records - November 22, 1967 - S/PV.1382
- Paragraph 67
(4)
Security Council Official Records - November 22, 1967 - S/PV.1382
- Paragraph 117
(5)
Security Council Official Records - November 22, 1967 - S/PV.1382
- Paragraph 117
(6)
Transcript, Arthur J. Goldberg Oral History Interview I, 3/23/83,
by Ted Gittinger; Lyndon B. Johnson Library. March 23, 1983; Pg
I-10
(7)
"Russia stalls UN Action on Middle East." The Chicago
Tribune. November 21, 1967 pg. B9
(8)
Goldberg, Arthur J., "Resolution 242: After 20 Years."
The Middle East: Islamic Law and Peace (U.S. Resolution 242: Origin,
Meaning and Significance.) National Committee on American Foreign
Policy; April 2002. (Originally written by Arthur J. Goldberg for
the American Foreign Policy Interests on the occasion of its twentieth
anniversary in 1988.)
|